The admissions process to our nation’s highly selective colleges aspires to be meritocratic. Admissions officers at these institutions endeavor to admit intellectually curious students from all corners of our diverse world. 

Admissions officers aspire to admit students of all different ethnicities, faiths, sexual orientations, and gender identities. They aspire to admit students from across the socioeconomic spectrum. They aspire to admit students with excellent grades and scores. They aspire to admit students who will change the world in very specific ways. They aspire to admit athletes who will help their athletic teams, science researchers who will make the next great discoveries, and writers who will pen works of fiction that will shape the zeitgeist.

Post-SCOTUS Ruling College Admissions: A Process Under Fire

That sounds like a tall order, right? Admissions officers at our nation’s elite colleges must create all sorts of balances so they don’t admit too many recruited baseball players or too few Native American students in an incoming class (yes, even after the June 2023 fall of Affirmative Action, our nation’s elite colleges still seek to admit diverse classes by capitalizing on Chief Justice Roberts’ loophole).

Of course, it’s a process — and not a perfect process. As Ross Douthat opined a few years back in a piece in The New York Times, “The College Admissions Trilemma,” “Lately the critiques have come from all directions. Asian-Americans have noticed that the current racial balance on campuses is sustained, in part, by suppressing Asian numbers. Populists of the left and right have pointed out that meritocracy often has racial diversity without socioeconomic diversity, reproducing a multi-hued but still immensely privileged elite. And the new progressivism has attacked that racial diversity as insufficient, because it still leaves blacks and Hispanics alienated within a system dominated by rich white kids.”

There is No Perfect Solution to Fixing the College Admissions Process

So, what can be done about this dilemma? Well, we’ve proposed many imperfect changes over the years on the pages of Ivy Coach’s college admissions blog and in the press — from restricting the legacy pool to development cases only so these admits can continue to subsidize the educations of low-income students but so not as many slots are earmarked for the progeny of alumni to eliminating slots in admissions for some sports that generate little revenue for the schools.

Mr. Douthat, in his well-argued editorial, suggests some other imperfect fixes to the system before closing his piece with this gem: “Another, grimmer answer is that the modern meritocracy has too many flaws and contradictions to either allow dramatic reform or to command widespread support without it. Which means that a system lacking legitimacy and under siege from all directions may be with us for many matriculations yet to come.” We at Ivy Coach echo his sentiment.